Rumors and Misinformation

Nitcentral's Bulletin Brash Reflections: DS9: DS9 Kitchen Sink: *** Old Sinks ***: Rumors and Misinformation
By Hans Thielman on Tuesday, June 08, 1999 - 10:45 am:

Before DS9 ended, there were all these rumors floating around that Odo was going to die. Happily, he didn't. However, as I recall, there was no scuttlebutt of any sort as to what would happen to Sisko. Why?


By Matthew Patterson (Mpatterson) on Tuesday, June 08, 1999 - 11:56 am:

Actually there was. We also heard that Avery Brooks tried to change what happened to him becaue he felt it would be offensive to African-Americans. Obviously, he didn't succeed.


By Sue on Tuesday, June 08, 1999 - 4:49 pm:

There were rumors and changed premises even before DS9 aired. Sisco and Dax were going to have an uncomfortable attraction that they would try to deny.


By MikeC on Wednesday, June 09, 1999 - 2:56 pm:

What was offensive about it? That an African American can't become something important?


By Matthew Patterson (Mpatterson) on Wednesday, June 09, 1999 - 4:09 pm:

Actually, he thought the "death and becoming a Prophet" thing would be offensive. Don't ask me. I'm glad to see that it wasn't changed.


By Sarah Perkins on Thursday, June 10, 1999 - 12:32 pm:

I don't remember hearing any spoilers about Odo's return to the link. That floored me! [anyone want to bet the Odo-will-die rumor was started by Paramount so that what actually happened would have a not-spoiled impact?]


By B.F. on Thursday, June 10, 1999 - 6:01 pm:

Where's the Enterprise! I want to see the Enterprise! Remember that rumor where the Enterprise was supposedly going to show up in one of the final episodes? And that other one where Worf got mad at Julian and Ezri and left the station (some thought that explained what Worf was really doing on the Enterprise in ST:INSURRECTION)? I still wish the Enterprise would've shown up in some form in the final episode or something -- even if it was just a backround shot....


By Electron on Thursday, June 10, 1999 - 7:10 pm:

And there was a rumor that DS9 would be converted into space debris at the end. No party at Vic's...


By Anonymous on Friday, June 11, 1999 - 12:21 pm:

But Ira Behr said long before the episode aired that the only guarantee was that the station would not be destroyed.


By Phillip Culley on Friday, June 11, 1999 - 9:47 pm:

I was looking through a DS9 guide I had which was released at the beginning of season 7. It included a list of season 7 episodes already produced, and I found a reference to an episode called 'Dysfunctional', in which
"Ezri secretly arranges to have her symbiont removed by an alien doctor, not being able to cope with her new lifestyle anymore"
Does anyone have any idea where this storyline came from, and whatever happened to it?


By Slinky Frog!!!!! on Monday, June 14, 1999 - 11:18 pm:

They were thinking of it, but it got scraped!! I quess TPTB didn't think it was believable.


By Cepstrum on Sunday, August 08, 2010 - 5:39 am:

I think Avery Brooks was unhappy with the notion of his character's "death" and subsequent leaving a fatherless black son behind. He thought it perpetuated the sad fact (and stereotype) that most black American children have absentee fathers. I read he did get the producers to insert a line of Sisko indicating he'd be back one day.

I don't the problem was with Jake: he was an adult by then. But IIRC he left behind Kasidy and their unborn child.

I liked the way Avery aquitted himself throughout the series as a tough guy with a tender heart who cared deeply for his son and his own father. I bet Avery had something to do with that, for he's quite a pro. He since taught drama courses in college.

Consider the contrast to Picard, who disliked children, never married, and didn't even get along with his own family.


By Luigi Novi (Luigi_novi) on Sunday, August 08, 2010 - 3:19 pm:

How do you know he was unhappy about it?


By Brian FitzGerald (Brifitz1980) on Monday, August 09, 2010 - 12:43 am:

Avery Brooks has said so. I'm sorry but I don't have the energy to dig it out of cyberspace but I've seen it before too. It was Brooks who insisted that Sisko say that he would return some day because of that, all too common, stereotype of black men who knock up their girls and than split. The 24th century is supposed to be passed such things, but Star Trek is a franchise that's produced today for today's audience. And I can totally see Brooks' issue that people will see "look at that; the final frontier & still the black man knocks up a woman and than splits."


By Brian Baker (Brianb) on Monday, August 09, 2010 - 1:18 am:

@ Cepstrum & BriFitz, forget the stereotype for the moment. Sisko's "death" does *loosely* follow an old Hollywood TV formula: Any character that marries and/or "does it" results in one character's "death", or other form of departure from the series. It was told at a convention that I attended circa 2000 by Gil Gerard.

True, this was the series' finale, but it happened nonetheless. Remember Worf & Jadzia? The O'Briens are a notable exception.

I can hear the Guild rummaging through your minds thinking of other exceptions. "What about Leeta/Rom?" I suggest a new topic: "Which Married with Children Couples Made It To the End of a Series' Run Intact?" In fact, I'll start it myself.


Add a Message


This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Username:  
Password: