The Valley of Fear

Nitcentral's Bulletin Brash Reflections: Sherlock Holmes: The Valley of Fear
PLOT SUMMARY: Holmes and Watson are called out to Birlstone Manor to investigate the sensational killing of John Douglas. The investigation leads to Douglas' association with a Pennsylvania secret society of murderers a decade previously. The case has such far-reaching implications that no less a person than the villanous Professor Moriarty has his fingers in it.

NITS:
CHRONOLOGICAL CONUNDRUM: Watson states that this story takes place in the late eighties, and it must be before 1891, since Moriarty figures in it. But Billy the page boy, a character who elsewhere only appears in the adventures circa 1900, is present here. He stated in one of those other adventures that "The Adventure of the Empty House", which has to take place post-Moriarty, happened "before my time".
By Jennifer Pope on Saturday, November 27, 1999 - 2:53 pm:

In this story Watson seems to know all about Professor Moriarty. However, in 'The Final Problem' he claims complete ignorance of the villain's existence. Odd, isn't it?


By Omer on Saturday, November 27, 1999 - 4:17 pm:

this is a personnal favorite of mine. I don't really know why, but I liked the slight snobbism of English criminals being better then American ones, and I liked Watson's off base suspicions and Holmes's questions, which as usual go un answered by all.

It's kind of a formula, isn't it? Holmes points out everyone's attention to some small detail, and everyone ignores it, even thought it is the solution for the puzzle.


By Todd Pence on Saturday, November 27, 1999 - 10:29 pm:

This is also my personal favorite Holmes story. Part two, which details Douglas/McMurdo's adventures in the Valley of Fear may be the best thing Doyle's ever written.
It's interesting that Moriarty has become such a well-remembered character, since this is the only Holmes story by Doyle besides "The Final Problem" in which he figures. And in this one, he's in a completely offstage role.


By Professor Moriarty on Monday, November 29, 1999 - 1:53 pm:

Dear me, Mr. Holmes! Dear me!


By Todd Pence on Sunday, March 19, 2000 - 6:18 pm:

The code Porlock uses in his message to Holmes is problematic in more ways than one. In the first place, of what use is a code that makes no provisions for proper nouns? Isn't anyone in Moriarity's organization who might intercept the message and see in plain english the words "DOUGLAS" and "BIRLSTONE" written going to know immediately what the missive pertains to? Also, Porlock later sends a message to Holmes advising him that he may be under suspicion and to ignore and destroy the coded message - but this no less incriminiating message he writes in PLAIN UNCODED ENGLISH!


By Merat on Sunday, January 28, 2001 - 4:28 pm:

Didn't Moriarty appear in many of the movies?


By Jesse on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 - 7:26 pm:

Merat: Didn't Moriarty appear in many of the movies?

I've been watching the Jeremy Brett movies lately. It's interesting that Moriarty is added in to "The Red-Headed League," as the force behind John Clay's attempted theft of the 60,000 napoleons from the Coburg branch bank. Moriarty has a few scenes and announces his intent to "make [Holmes] an offer he can't refuse," after Holmes & Co. thwart the bank robbery. It actually works really well.

The interesting thing is that, in this series, "The Final Problem" is the very next story shown. No doubt the producers feared that viewers would not like to see Holmes "killed" by someone whom they'd never heard of; hence, the need to insert Moriarty into the preceding story.


Add a Message


This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Username:  
Password: